AUTONOMOUS INTERSECTION MANAGEMENT

Autonomous intersection management is an alternative intersection control in which vehicle movements are individually coordinated. Vehicles use wireless communications to request an intersection movement at a specific time and speed from the intersection manager. The intersection manager simulates requests and accepts a non-conflicting subset. Vehicle connectivity is required for coordination, and automation is needed for precise adherence to trajectories. 

tbr_1.jpeg

Illustration of tile-based reservations by Fajardo et al. (2011)


(COOPERATIVE) ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL

Adaptive cruise control uses sensors and automation to control vehicle speed while maintaining a safe gap between the vehicle in front. Cooperative adaptive cruise control uses communications to coordinate acceleration and braking so that platoons of vehicles can maintain reduced spacing at freeway speeds. Reduced following headways increase road capacity.

Connected vehicle communications can be used to communicate time-dependent changes in lane direction or type, and automation can be required to obey such changes. Frequent changes in lane direction could improve capacity allocation during peak hours, and dynamic transit lanes could provide bus priority while permitting use of right-of-way at other times. 

6082932-fig-1-source-large_1.gif

Illustration of dynamic lane reversal by Hausknecht et al. (2011)

Expand all

Related Papers

Related Papers


SHARED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

Instead of autonomous vehicles being owned privately, they might instead be used as part of a ridesharing service. Without the need to pay a driver, the cost may be competitive to personal vehicles. Shared autonomous vehicles create many different challenges, such as how to match passengers to vehicles, and how to coordinate vehicle route choice. If the fleet of shared autonomous vehicles is sufficiently large, they may contribute significantly to congestion.

uber_1.jpeg

TRAVEL DEMAND

Autonomous vehicles permit hands-free driving, and vehicles could even travel empty. Travelers may be willing to drive more, live farther from work, or avoid parking costs by sending their vehicle on empty trips to park elsewhere. Overall, autonomous vehicles could cause increases in the number and length of trips, resulting in significant increases in travel demand.


MAX-PRESSURE INTERSECTION CONTROL

Max-pressure intersection control models the network as a Markov decision process; queue lengths are the state, traffic signals are the control variables, and stochasticity comes from entering demand and turning ratios. Rather than solve it numerically (which would be computationally intractable due to the curse of dimensionality), max-pressure control proves that an analytical pressure-based adaptive signal control results in a positive recurrent Markov chain if at all possible. Equivalently, network outflow = inflow for max-pressure control if it could be achieved by any signal timing. Furthermore, max-pressure control is decentralized; each intersection optimizes its own timing based on the surrounding vehicle queues. 

video_orig.jpeg

PARKING RESERVATION SYSTEMS

Up to 40% of travel times and 34% of urban congestion is caused by searching for parking. Previous studies have designed and implemented internet-based parking reservation systems that allow drivers to reserve parking for future times before arriving at their destination. I'm interested in optimizing the behavior of individual users and predicting the effects of widespread use of parking reservation systems on traffic networks.

prk-generic-514x331-parking-res_1.jpeg

DYNAMIC MICROTOLLING

srta-home-feature-live-tolls_2.jpeg

In static flow models, marginal cost tolls have been shown to induce system optimal route choice. For dynamic or non-recurrent congestion, dynamic microtolling could encourage vehicles to avoid congested roads. For instance, raising the toll on an incident link would induce diversions. Computer-aided route guidance with real-time updates of toll changes is necessary to anticipate and respond effectively to dynamic microtolling.


CYBERSECURITY

The increasing reliance on computer systems in transportation also increases their vulnerability to cyber-attacks. Unfortunately, many currently used systems are poorly protected. Traffic signals are notoriously easy to hack, and have been intentionally disrupted by protesters. Variable message signs were hacked to warn drivers of zombies ahead. Although so far only minor impacts on traffic have been experienced, coordinated attacks on signal infrastructure during peak periods could create gridlock delaying millions of travelers.

zombies_1.jpeg

TRANSPORTATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT

emissions_2.png

28% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions were caused by transportation in 2016. New vehicle technologies such as autonomous vehicles and intelligent transportation systems could reduce the environmental impacts in several ways. Technologies that reduce congestion also improve the fuel efficiency. Autonomous vehicles could support alternative fuels such as electric vehicles through empty repositioning to improve access to recharging. Reservation-based intersection controls could reduce acceleration/deceleration cycles at intersections. 


TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT

Traffic assignment models predict vehicle route choices and the resulting congestion, typically assuming that vehicles seek to minimize their individual travel time or cost. Planners combine traffic assignment with trip distribution and mode choice to anticipate future congestion and determine infrastructure needs. As shown by the Braess paradox, new infrastructure can increase congestion due to selfish route choice, and traffic assignment models can analyze the route choice impacts of new infrastructure.
Although traffic assignment traditionally used link performance functions to estimate travel times, dynamic traffic assignment ​uses more realistic mesoscopic flow models that include congestion propagation, queue spillback, and shockwaves. However, more realistic flow models eliminates many of the nice mathematical properties of static traffic assignment. Solving dynamic traffic assignment efficiently for large city networks, and integrating it with planning models, are open problems that are highly important for using the model in practice.
transcad-assignment-map_1.jpeg

SPONSORED PROJECTS

download_3.png

Cost/benefit analysis of fuel efficient speed control using signal phasing and timing (SPaT) data: evaluation for future connected corridor deployment, for MnDOT (with Zongxuan Sun)

nsf-4-color-bitmap-logo.png

Extending Max-Pressure Control for Traffic Network Operations, for National Science Foundation

download_3.png

Towards Implementation of Max-Pressure Signal Timing on Minnesota Roads, for LRRB

COMPLETED PROJECTS

download_3.png

Generating Traffic Information from Connected Vehicle V2V Basic Safety Messages​, for MnDOT (with John Hourdos)

download-2_2.jpeg

Improving intersection safety through variable speed limits for connected vehicles, for Roadway Safety Institute (with Chen-Fu Liao)

 qwtubcz0-400x400_3.jpeg

Non-linear spacing policy and network analysis for shared-road platooning, for Center for Transportation Studies (with Rajesh Rajamani)

 qwtubcz0-400x400_3.jpeg

Pressure-based dispatch for shared autonomous vehicles​, for Center for Transportation Studies

636288878010806255-txdot-logo_5.jpeg

Bringing smart transport to Texans: ensuring the benefits of a connected and autonomous transport system in Texas, for TxDOT (PI: Steve Boyles)

636288878010806255-txdot-logo_5.jpeg

An assessment of autonomous vehicles: traffic impacts and infrastructure needs, for TxDOT (PI: Steve Boyles)

636288878010806255-txdot-logo_5.jpeg

Implications of automated vehicles on safety, design, and operation of the Texas highway system, for TxDOT (PI: Steve Boyles)

qnrberk_1.png

Improving bus routing for KIPP charter schools, for D-STOP (PI: Steve Boyles)